Martinez, G. v. Berks Co. CCP Judges
This text of Martinez, G. v. Berks Co. CCP Judges (Martinez, G. v. Berks Co. CCP Judges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
GILBERT M. MARTINEZ, : No. 48 MM 2022 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : ROBERT J. SHENKIN, JEFFREY K. : SPRECHER, THOMAS G. PARISI IN THEIR : OFFICIAL CAPACITY, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 10th day of August, 2022, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process is GRANTED. The Petition for Writ of Mandamus, the “Ex Parte Motion to Void
Judgment Abinito [sic],” the Application for Relief, and the Application for Relief Pursuant
to Pa.R.A.P. 123 are DENIED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the names of
the jurists from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Martinez, G. v. Berks Co. CCP Judges, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-g-v-berks-co-ccp-judges-pa-2022.