Martinez (Freddy) Vs. State
This text of 469 P.3d 187 (Martinez (Freddy) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
FREDDY MARTINEZ, A/K/A FREDYS No. 81529 A. MARTINEZ, A/K/A FREDYS ARCANGLE-MARTINEZ, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from "the Judgment/Order entered on the 15 day of June, 2020." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Kathleen E. Delaney, Judge. This court's review of this appeal reveals jurisdictional defects. First, the district court granted appellant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Thus, appellant is not aggrieved. See NRS 177.015 (only an aggrieved party may appeal). Second, no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an order denying a motion for transcripts at state expense and denying a motion for appointment of counsel. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 792 P.2d 1133 (1990). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
LIL364,A) A/Wm-a Stiglich Silver SUPREME COURT OF NEMDA
(0) 1947A .4ffa3. cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge Freddy Martinez Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1, 147A ...4Wta. 9
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
469 P.3d 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-freddy-vs-state-nev-2020.