Martinez, Ex Parte Hugo Israel

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 2, 2012
DocketAP-76,786
StatusPublished

This text of Martinez, Ex Parte Hugo Israel (Martinez, Ex Parte Hugo Israel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martinez, Ex Parte Hugo Israel, (Tex. 2012).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,786

EX PARTE HUGO ISRAEL MARTINEZ, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. B-35,031-A IN THE 161ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FROM ECTOR COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession with

intent to deliver a controlled substance and sentenced to sixteen years’ imprisonment.

Applicant contends he was denied his right to appeal, because although trial counsel timely

filed a motion for new trial and was subsequently permitted to withdraw, appellate counsel was not

appointed until after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal. We remanded this application to the

trial court for findings of fact and conclusions of law. 2

The trial court has determined that Applicant was denied the opportunity to appeal his

conviction through no fault of his own. See Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the judgment

of conviction in Cause No. B-35,031-A from the 161st Judicial District Court of Ector County.

Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of appeal so that he

may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. Within ten days of the issuance of

this opinion, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent

and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an attorney to

represent Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence had been

imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant

desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file a written notice of appeal in the

trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Delivered: May 2, 2012 Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Riley
193 S.W.3d 900 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Martinez, Ex Parte Hugo Israel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-ex-parte-hugo-israel-texcrimapp-2012.