Martinez-Class v. Ranger American Armo
Opinion
Not For Publication in West's Federal Reporter Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 03-1433
EFRAÍN MARTÍNEZ-CLASS; MILAGROS LÓPEZ-LÓPEZ;
CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP MARTÍNEZ-LÓPEZ,
Plaintiffs, Appellants,
v.
RANGER AMERICAN ARMORED SERVICES, INC., A-Z INS. CO.,
Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
[Hon. Salvador E. Casellas, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Torruella, Selya and Lipez, Circuit Judges.
Benito Gutiérrez-Díaz, for appellants.
Howard Pravda, with whom Goldman Antonetti & Córdova, PSC, was on brief, for appellees.
March 18, 2004
Per Curiam. After having reviewed the briefs and the record, we summarily affirm substantially for the reasons stated in the district court's January 31, 2003 opinion. Class v. Ranger American Armored Serv., Inc., 245 F. Supp. 2d 370 (D.P.R. 2003).
Affirmed. See Loc. R. 27 (c).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martinez-Class v. Ranger American Armo (Martinez-Class v. Ranger American Armo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.