Martinez Antonio Hernandez, Jose Adan Rodriguez, and Jose Jiovani Hernandez v. Felipe Ramirez
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS
January 26, 2026, we issued a notice advising Appellants that unless their brief was filed within
ten days, we might dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Appellants neither timely filed a
brief nor requested a second extension. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1) (authorizing an appellate
court to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when the appellant fails to file an appellant’s
brief).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1),
42.3(b), 43.2(f). We dismiss all pending motions as moot.
MARIA SALAS MENDOZA, Chief Justice
February 11, 2026 Before Salas Mendoza, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martinez Antonio Hernandez, Jose Adan Rodriguez, and Jose Jiovani Hernandez v. Felipe Ramirez (Martinez Antonio Hernandez, Jose Adan Rodriguez, and Jose Jiovani Hernandez v. Felipe Ramirez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.