Martinez Antonio Hernandez, Jose Adan Rodriguez, and Jose Jiovani Hernandez v. Felipe Ramirez

Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)·Decided February 11, 2026·No. 08-25-00261-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

January 26, 2026, we issued a notice advising Appellants that unless their brief was filed within

ten days, we might dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Appellants neither timely filed a

brief nor requested a second extension. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1) (authorizing an appellate

court to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when the appellant fails to file an appellant’s

brief).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1),

42.3(b), 43.2(f). We dismiss all pending motions as moot.

MARIA SALAS MENDOZA, Chief Justice

February 11, 2026 Before Salas Mendoza, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martinez Antonio Hernandez, Jose Adan Rodriguez, and Jose Jiovani Hernandez v. Felipe Ramirez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Martinez Antonio Hernandez, Jose Adan Rodriguez, and Jose Jiovani Hernandez v. Felipe Ramirez (Martinez Antonio Hernandez, Jose Adan Rodriguez, and Jose Jiovani Hernandez v. Felipe Ramirez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.