Martinelli v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Martinelli v. State

467 So. 2d 841, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1093, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13750

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 1, 1985

DocketNo. 85-271

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 467 So. 2d 841 (Martinelli v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martinelli v. State, 467 So. 2d 841, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1093, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13750 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion for post conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In his motion, appellant alleged that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney failed to discover that “[t]his case was a prime case of entrapment.” However, appellant did not comply with Rule 3.850 in that his motion contained no facts which indicated that he may have been entitled to a defense of entrapment, or which otherwise supported his allegation. The other allegations contained in appellant’s motion are without merit.

Accordingly, the order denying post conviction relief is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and HURLEY and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion for post conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In his motion, appellant alleged that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney failed to discover that “[t]his case was a prime case of entrapment.” However, appellant did not comply with Rule 3.850 in that his motion contained no facts which indicated that he may have been entitled to a defense of entrapment, or which otherwise supported his allegation. The other allegations contained in appellant’s motion are without merit.

Accordingly, the order denying post conviction relief is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and HURLEY and DELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

467 So. 2d 841, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1093, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinelli-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack