Martinek v. State

108 A.D.3d 1048, 967 N.Y.S.2d 859
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 5, 2013·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Joseph E. Fahey, [1049] A.J.), entered March 16, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 10. The order, among other things, continued petitioner’s commitment to a secure treatment facility.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from an order determining, inter alia, that he is a dangerous sex offender requiring continued confinement in a secure treatment facility pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 10. We dismiss the appeal as moot because a subsequent order has been entered that continues petitioner’s confinement for another year (see Matter of State of New York v Grant, 71 AD3d 1502, 1503 [2010]; see also Matter of Robles v Evans, 100 AD3d 1455, 1455 [2012]). Present — Scudder, P.J., Smith, Centra and Lindley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martinek v. State, 108 A.D.3d 1048, 967 N.Y.S.2d 859 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

108 A.D.3d 1048 (Martinek v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Ernest v. v. State of New York
2017 NY Slip Op 3818 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
HOLMES, RICHARD v. STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
Holmes v. State
125 A.D.3d 1306 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
State v. Christopher X.
110 A.D.3d 1395 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)