Martine v. Whitehair

4 Navajo Rptr. 121
CourtNavajo Nation Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 15, 1983
DocketNo. A-CV-32-82
StatusPublished

This text of 4 Navajo Rptr. 121 (Martine v. Whitehair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navajo Nation Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martine v. Whitehair, 4 Navajo Rptr. 121 (navajoctapp 1983).

Opinion

The issue before the Court is for a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus requesting this Court to order the Honorable Henry Whitehair to reconsider a Motion for Reconsideration due to alleged error in finding the burden of proof and a prima facie case that failed to demonstrate the mens rea of a criminal offense. While in reviewing the related documents pertinent to this petition, the Court finds that such procedural directive to the Court is not within the scope of relief available in the instant case. Petitioner is familiar with such rules of procedure as adopted by this Court and can seek alternative remedies through an appellate procedure. This Court will not order a District Court judge to reconsider a motion in which the trial judge has already heard and ruled on. Only in the most extraordinary situations will the province of the Court of Appeals be brought into operation ordering a mandamus action against a trial judge. Such being the facts found herein and upon review by the Chief Justice pursuant to 7 N.T.C. Sec. 801, petitioners request for this Writ of Mandamus is hereby dismissed.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Navajo Rptr. 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martine-v-whitehair-navajoctapp-1983.