Martine v. Division of Employment Security

Missouri Court of Appeals

Martine v. Division of Employment Security

311 S.W.3d 410, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 754, 2010 WL 2265144

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 8, 2010

DocketWD 71527

StatusPublished

This text of 311 S.W.3d 410 (Martine v. Division of Employment Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martine v. Division of Employment Security, 311 S.W.3d 410, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 754, 2010 WL 2265144 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Tammy Martine appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which found that Martine was discharged for misconduct connected with work and was, therefore, disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. On appeal, Martine claims that the Commission’s decision was erroneous because the evidence did not establish that she willfully violated her employer’s rules. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The decision of the Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Tammy Martine appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which found that Martine was discharged for misconduct connected with work and was, therefore, disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. On appeal, Martine claims that the Commission’s decision was erroneous because the evidence did not establish that she willfully violated her employer’s rules. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The decision of the Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

311 S.W.3d 410, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 754, 2010 WL 2265144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martine-v-division-of-employment-security-moctapp-2010.