Martine v. Division of Employment Security

Missouri Court of Appeals

Martine v. Division of Employment Security

311 S.W.3d 410, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 754, 2010 WL 2265144

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 8, 2010·No. WD 71527·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Tammy Martine appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which found that Martine was discharged for misconduct connected with work and was, therefore, disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. On appeal, Martine claims that the Commission’s decision was erroneous because the evidence did not establish that she willfully violated her employer’s rules. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The decision of the Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Tammy Martine appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which found that Martine was discharged for misconduct connected with work and was, therefore, disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. On appeal, Martine claims that the Commission’s decision was erroneous because the evidence did not establish that she willfully violated her employer’s rules. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The decision of the Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Martine v. Division of Employment Security, 311 S.W.3d 410, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 754, 2010 WL 2265144 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

311 S.W.3d 410 (Martine v. Division of Employment Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.