Martindale v. Waas

11 F. 551
District Court, D. Minnesota·Decided March 15, 1882·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Nelson, D. J.

The motion is denied. The court passed upon all the issues necessary to determine the rights of the parties, and gave a decree in favor of the plaintiff. The law of the state of Minnesota requiring a judge to give his decision in writing upon every issue made by the pleadings is not binding upon the federal courts. The equity practice, as restricted by the rules promulgated by the supreme court of the United States, regulates the mode of proceedings, and no law of congress imposes upon the judge any such duty as indicated.

When the main issue which controls the result is determined, all others presented by the pleadings are, by implication, decided in harmony therewith.

See note on page 580.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martindale v. Waas, 11 F. 551 (mnd 1882).

11 F. 551 (Martindale v. Waas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co. v. Marland
239 F. 1 (Third Circuit, 1917)