Martindale v. Waas

11 F. 551
CourtDistrict Court, D. Minnesota
DecidedMarch 15, 1882
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 11 F. 551 (Martindale v. Waas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martindale v. Waas, 11 F. 551 (mnd 1882).

Opinion

Nelson, D. J.

The motion is denied. The court passed upon all the issues necessary to determine the rights of the parties, and gave a decree in favor of the plaintiff. The law of the state of Minnesota requiring a judge to give his decision in writing upon every issue made by the pleadings is not binding upon the federal courts. The equity practice, as restricted by the rules promulgated by the supreme court of the United States, regulates the mode of proceedings, and no law of congress imposes upon the judge any such duty as indicated.

When the main issue which controls the result is determined, all others presented by the pleadings are, by implication, decided in harmony therewith.

See note on page 580.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co. v. Marland
239 F. 1 (Third Circuit, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 F. 551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martindale-v-waas-mnd-1882.