Martin v. Wall

Supreme Court of Georgia

Martin v. Wall

80 S.E. 629, 141 Ga. 201, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 376

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedDecember 12, 1913

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 80 S.E. 629 (Martin v. Wall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. Wall, 80 S.E. 629, 141 Ga. 201, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 376 (Ga. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. The assignments of error on the rulings upon admissibility of evidence are without merit.'

2. In an action for land the plaintiff and defendant claimed title from a common source. The defendant claimed under a deed, and the control- ' ling question was whether the deed had been delivered. The evidence was [202]*202insufficient to show delivery (Maddox v. Gray, 75 Ga. 452); and the judge did not err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.

December 12, 1913. Rehearing denied January 14, 19T4.

Complaint for land. Before Judge Pendleton. Fulton superior court. October 17, 1912.

A. H. Davis, for plaintiff in error. Bosser & Brandon, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI