Martin v. Walking Lumber & Supply Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Martin v. Walking Lumber & Supply Co.

113 So. 714, 94 Fla. 208

DecidedJuly 13, 1927

StatusPublished

This text of 113 So. 714 (Martin v. Walking Lumber & Supply Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. Walking Lumber & Supply Co., 113 So. 714, 94 Fla. 208 (Fla. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The transcript of the record in this case having been examined and considered by the Court, it is found that the decree herein should be affirmed, except as to that pdrt of the decree allowing attorney’s fees, which should be reversed, and the costs'of the appeal should be taxed against the complainant on authority of the opinion in the case of Kate Havlin Martin et al. v. Rother, decided at this term of the Court, and it is so ordered.

Reversed in part.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The transcript of the record in this case having been examined and considered by the Court, it is found that the decree herein should be affirmed, except as to that pdrt of the decree allowing attorney’s fees, which should be reversed, and the costs'of the appeal should be taxed against the complainant on authority of the opinion in the case of Kate Havlin Martin et al. v. Rother, decided at this term of the Court, and it is so ordered.

Reversed in part.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 So. 714, 94 Fla. 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-walking-lumber-supply-co-fla-1927.