Martin v. Wade

22 Tex. 224
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 22 Tex. 224 (Martin v. Wade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin v. Wade, 22 Tex. 224 (Tex. 1858).

Opinion

Roberts, J.

Tbis is a suit upon a title bond, for specific performance. There was no service of process on tbe defendants ; nor does it appear, by tbe recital in tbe judgment entry, that they appeared. Tbe plaintiff appeared, and acknowledged satisfaction of bis demand, and tbe court rendered simply a judgment for costs, against tbe defendants.

It certainly would have been erroneous, in tbis case, to have rendered a judgment against tbe defendants for costs, they having neither appeared nor been served with process. But there being no decree, disposing of tbe cause, there is no final judgment which tbis court can revise. (Warren v. Shuman, 5 Tex. Rep. 441.) Tbe writ of error will therefore be dismissed.

Writ of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nelon v. Thomas
329 S.W.2d 148 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1959)
Eastham v. Sallis
60 Tex. 576 (Texas Supreme Court, 1884)
Owens v. Levy
1 White & W. 177 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1883)
Giersa v. Yocum
1 White & W. 130 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1883)
International & G. N. Railroad v. Smith County
58 Tex. 74 (Texas Supreme Court, 1882)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 Tex. 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-wade-tex-1858.