Martin v. Wade

22 Tex. 224
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1858·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Roberts, J.

Tbis is a suit upon a title bond, for specific performance. There was no service of process on tbe defendants ; nor does it appear, by tbe recital in tbe judgment entry, that they appeared. Tbe plaintiff appeared, and acknowledged satisfaction of bis demand, and tbe court rendered simply a judgment for costs, against tbe defendants.

It certainly would have been erroneous, in tbis case, to have rendered a judgment against tbe defendants for costs, they having neither appeared nor been served with process. But there being no decree, disposing of tbe cause, there is no final judgment which tbis court can revise. (Warren v. Shuman, 5 Tex. Rep. 441.) Tbe writ of error will therefore be dismissed.

Writ of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. Wade, 22 Tex. 224 (Tex. 1858).

22 Tex. 224 (Martin v. Wade) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nelon v. Thomas
329 S.W.2d 148 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1959)
Eastham v. Sallis
60 Tex. 576 (Texas Supreme Court, 1884)
Owens v. Levy
1 White & W. 177 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1883)
Giersa v. Yocum
1 White & W. 130 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1883)
International & G. N. Railroad v. Smith County
58 Tex. 74 (Texas Supreme Court, 1882)