Martin v. Vedder
1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 385
Opinion
“ When a debtor advances money to his creditor, which is intended by both parties to be applied on the debt due, it is but another name for payment.”
Decree of Chancellor reversed accordingly.
93=* See Banter v. Garmo, 1 Sandford’s Ch. R. 384.
Lansing v. Woodworth, “ 43.
Craig v. Tappen, 2 “ 78,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martin v. Vedder, 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 385 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).
1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 385 (Martin v. Vedder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.