Martin v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Martin v. United States

598 F. App'x 199

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 20, 2015·No. No. 14-7710·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Earl Martin, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying [200] relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martin v. United States, No. 5:13-hc-02244-D (E.D.N.C. Nov. 6, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Earl Martin, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying [200] relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martin v. United States, No. 5:13-hc-02244-D (E.D.N.C. Nov. 6, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Martin v. United States, 598 F. App'x 199 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

598 F. App'x 199 (Martin v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related