Martin v. United States
33 F.2d 1022, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2864
Opinion
The order of the District Court, overruling the motion of the plaintiff in error for a consideration of his special plea of limitations to .the indictment, and for a vacation of the judgment in this cause, is affirmed, on the authority of Martin v. Biddle (C. C. A.) 16 F.(2d) 118, and U. S. v. Mayer, 235 U. S. 55, 35 S. Ct. 16, 59 L. Ed. 129.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martin v. United States, 33 F.2d 1022, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2864 (10th Cir. 1929).
33 F.2d 1022 (Martin v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Application of Lewis
1959 OK CR 56 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1959)