Martin v. United States

33 F.2d 1022, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2864
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedJune 6, 1929
DocketNo. 18
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 33 F.2d 1022 (Martin v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin v. United States, 33 F.2d 1022, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2864 (10th Cir. 1929).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order of the District Court, overruling the motion of the plaintiff in error for a consideration of his special plea of limitations to .the indictment, and for a vacation of the judgment in this cause, is affirmed, on the authority of Martin v. Biddle (C. C. A.) 16 F.(2d) 118, and U. S. v. Mayer, 235 U. S. 55, 35 S. Ct. 16, 59 L. Ed. 129.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Application of Lewis
1959 OK CR 56 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 F.2d 1022, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-united-states-ca10-1929.