Martin v. United Farm Family Insurance

611 F. App'x 145
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 4, 2015·No. No. 14-2403·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bonnie Suzanne Martin, Sandra Yin-gling, Ashley Barber, Duane David Martin, and David Duane Martin appeal the magistrate judge’s order granting summary judgment to United Farm Family Insurance Co. in this diversity action arising out of a dispute over coverage under an insurance policy. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Martin v. United Farm Family Ins. Co., No. 1:14-cv-01578 (D.Md. Nov. 24, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. United Farm Family Insurance, 611 F. App'x 145 (4th Cir. 2015).

611 F. App'x 145 (Martin v. United Farm Family Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.