Martin v. United Farm Family Insurance
This text of 611 F. App'x 145 (Martin v. United Farm Family Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Bonnie Suzanne Martin, Sandra Yin-gling, Ashley Barber, Duane David Martin, and David Duane Martin appeal the magistrate judge’s order granting summary judgment to United Farm Family Insurance Co. in this diversity action arising out of a dispute over coverage under an insurance policy. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Martin v. United Farm Family Ins. Co., No. 1:14-cv-01578 (D.Md. Nov. 24, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
611 F. App'x 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-united-farm-family-insurance-ca4-2015.