Martin v. Travers

California Supreme Court

Martin v. Travers

7 Cal. 253

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1857

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 7 Cal. 253 (Martin v. Travers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. Travers, 7 Cal. 253 (Cal. 1857).

Pincite

Opinion

Burnett, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court—Murray, C. J., concurring.

This is an appeal from an order of the Superior Court of San Francisco refusing to dissolve an injunction. The three hundred and forty-seventh section of the Practice Act specifies the cases in which appeals are allowed from the orders and judgments of the District Courts and the Superior Court of San Francisco. No appeal is allowed from an order refusing to dissolve an injunction, nor from an order changing the place of trial. The appeal should be taken from the order granting the injunction.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burnett, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court—Murray, C. J., concurring.

This is an appeal from an order of the Superior Court of San Francisco refusing to dissolve an injunction. The three hundred and forty-seventh section of the Practice Act specifies the cases in which appeals are allowed from the orders and judgments of the District Courts and the Superior Court of San Francisco. No appeal is allowed from an order refusing to dissolve an injunction, nor from an order changing the place of trial. The appeal should be taken from the order granting the injunction.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Cal. 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-travers-cal-1857.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack