Martin v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., Inc.
This text of 164 So. 175 (Martin v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Following the granting of a rehearing, we have painstakingly reviewed the entire record herein and -have carefully considered the arguments made in brief and at the bar; and the result is that we are the more convinced of the correctness of our original conclusions.
We consider that the facts proven by the weight of the testimony and the probabilities are accurately set forth in our previous opinion.
The only substantial issue of law is in regard to the sufficiency of the original answer as containing a plea of contributory negligence and the propriety of allowing the amended answer definitely and clearly pleading contributory negligence. We deem any further consideration of these issues unnecessary, because in the view of the facts adopted by us the plaintiff was necessarily not guilty of negligence proximately causing or contributing to the accident.
For the reasons assigned, our previous decree is reinstated and is the final decree of this court.
Original decree reinstated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
164 So. 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-toye-bros-yellow-cab-co-inc-lactapp-1935.