Martin v. Town of Windham

Superior Court of Maine·Decided June 7, 2016·No. CUMcv-16-80·Unpublished

Opinion

STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT CUMBERLAND, ss CIVIL ACTION Docket No. CV-16-80

/

CATHERINE F. MARTIN,

Plaintiff

ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S

V. MOTION TO DISMISS

TOWN OF WINDHAM, Defendant

Before the court is defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint, in which plaintiff alleges that defendant destroyed her boat and damaged her raft by plowing a nearby dirt road . Plaintiff's claim is subject to the Maine Tort Claims Act. 14 M .R.S . § 8104-A(l) (2015). The Act requires plaintiff to file a written notice within 180 days after her claim accrues. 14 M .R.S. § 8107(1) (2015). Her claim accrued in February or March of 2014. (See 9 / 14 / 15 Statement of Claim.) There is no evidence in the record that plaintiff filed a written notice. Failure to comply with the notice provision bars plaintiff's claim. Deschenes v. City of Sanford, 2016 ME 56, <j[ 12, _ A.3d _ .

The entry is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.

Dated: June 7, 2016 ancy Mills

Justice, Superio

STATE OF MAIN£

Cumberland . ss . Clerk's Office

JUN 07 2016

RECEIVED . 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. Town of Windham, (Me. Super. Ct. 2016).

Martin v. Town of Windham (Martin v. Town of Windham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

John E. Deschenes v. City of Sanford
2016 ME 56 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2016)