Martin v. Tovar

Navajo Nation Ct. App.

Martin v. Tovar

3 Navajo Rptr. 27

Navajo Nation Court of Appeals·Decided September 16, 1980·No. No. A-CV-21-80·Published

Opinion

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

NOTE: This decision has been OVERRULED.

The Chief Justice of the Navajo Nation having considered the above captioned appeal pursuant to Title 7, Section 801 of the Navajo Tribal Code, hereby finds:

1. That the sole issue raised in this appeal is that the District Court erro red in dismissing appellant's counterclaim because appellees faded to answer said counterclaim; and

2. That there is no requirement that counterclaims be answered in the Courts of the Navajo Nation (GECC vs. Vandever, 1 Nav.R. 352 (1978)).

IT IS, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED that the above captioned appeal be dismissed on the grounds that GECC vs. Vandever supra, is dispositive of the sole issue raised upon appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

NOTE: This decision has been OVERRULED.

The Chief Justice of the Navajo Nation having considered the above captioned appeal pursuant to Title 7, Section 801 of the Navajo Tribal Code, hereby finds:

1. That the sole issue raised in this appeal is that the District Court erro red in dismissing appellant's counterclaim because appellees faded to answer said counterclaim; and

2. That there is no requirement that counterclaims be answered in the Courts of the Navajo Nation (GECC vs. Vandever, 1 Nav.R. 352 (1978)).

IT IS, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED that the above captioned appeal be dismissed on the grounds that GECC vs. Vandever supra, is dispositive of the sole issue raised upon appeal.

Martin v. Tovar, 3 Navajo Rptr. 27 (navajoctapp 1980).

Pincite

3 Navajo Rptr. 27 (Martin v. Tovar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.