Martin v. Tovar

Navajo Nation Ct. App.

Martin v. Tovar

3 Navajo Rptr. 27

CourtNavajo Nation Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 16, 1980

DocketNo. A-CV-21-80

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Navajo Rptr. 27 (Martin v. Tovar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navajo Nation Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. Tovar, 3 Navajo Rptr. 27 (navajoctapp 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

NOTE: This decision has been OVERRULED.

The Chief Justice of the Navajo Nation having considered the above captioned appeal pursuant to Title 7, Section 801 of the Navajo Tribal Code, hereby finds:

1. That the sole issue raised in this appeal is that the District Court erro red in dismissing appellant's counterclaim because appellees faded to answer said counterclaim; and

2. That there is no requirement that counterclaims be answered in the Courts of the Navajo Nation (GECC vs. Vandever, 1 Nav.R. 352 (1978)).

IT IS, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED that the above captioned appeal be dismissed on the grounds that GECC vs. Vandever supra, is dispositive of the sole issue raised upon appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

NOTE: This decision has been OVERRULED.

The Chief Justice of the Navajo Nation having considered the above captioned appeal pursuant to Title 7, Section 801 of the Navajo Tribal Code, hereby finds:

1. That the sole issue raised in this appeal is that the District Court erro red in dismissing appellant's counterclaim because appellees faded to answer said counterclaim; and

2. That there is no requirement that counterclaims be answered in the Courts of the Navajo Nation (GECC vs. Vandever, 1 Nav.R. 352 (1978)).

IT IS, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED that the above captioned appeal be dismissed on the grounds that GECC vs. Vandever supra, is dispositive of the sole issue raised upon appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Navajo Rptr. 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-tovar-navajoctapp-1980.