Martin v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Martin v. Taylor

21 La. Ann. 303

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 15, 1869

DocketNo. 1507

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 21 La. Ann. 303 (Martin v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. Taylor, 21 La. Ann. 303 (La. 1869).

Pincite

Opinion

Wyly, J.

This appeal was taken by one of the defendants, William M. Pinckard, who has not made his co-defendants parties thereto, by causing them to be cited.

It appears that a citation issued to the co-defendant, Zalmon Taylor, but it was not served on him either personally or at his domicile. C. P. 187, 188,189. It appears' that no citation ever issued for D. R. Carroll, warrantor, who was a party to the judgment.

Both Taylor and Carroll are evidently interested in maintaining the judgment of the lower court, and they should have been made parties to the appeal. 3 R. 436 5 5 R. 224 ; 9 R. 256; 12 R. 180; 8 A. 367; 11 A. 674; 14 A. 315.

Without a motion to dismiss, we will notice ex officio the want of proper parties to the appeal. Tupery v. Lafitte et al., 19 A. 296, and the authorities there cited.

It is therefore ordered that this appeal be dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wyly, J.

This appeal was taken by one of the defendants, William M. Pinckard, who has not made his co-defendants parties thereto, by causing them to be cited.

It appears that a citation issued to the co-defendant, Zalmon Taylor, but it was not served on him either personally or at his domicile. C. P. 187, 188,189. It appears' that no citation ever issued for D. R. Carroll, warrantor, who was a party to the judgment.

Both Taylor and Carroll are evidently interested in maintaining the judgment of the lower court, and they should have been made parties to the appeal. 3 R. 436 5 5 R. 224 ; 9 R. 256; 12 R. 180; 8 A. 367; 11 A. 674; 14 A. 315.

Without a motion to dismiss, we will notice ex officio the want of proper parties to the appeal. Tupery v. Lafitte et al., 19 A. 296, and the authorities there cited.

It is therefore ordered that this appeal be dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 La. Ann. 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-taylor-la-1869.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack