Martin v. Stoddard

New York City Court

Martin v. Stoddard

4 N.Y.S. 177, 24 N.Y. St. Rep. 111, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 240

DecidedJanuary 28, 1889

StatusPublished

This text of 4 N.Y.S. 177 (Martin v. Stoddard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York City Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. Stoddard, 4 N.Y.S. 177, 24 N.Y. St. Rep. 111, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 240 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

All the questions presented by the records in this ease have already been passed upon by this court, except the point that the notice of sale was not served upon the mortgagee of the lands sold for taxes. Laws 1883. c. 114, § 4, requires notice of sale to be served on the owners and mortgagee of the premises. Notice was served on the defendants, who were the owners. They cannot complain that the mortgagee was not served. Judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

All the questions presented by the records in this ease have already been passed upon by this court, except the point that the notice of sale was not served upon the mortgagee of the lands sold for taxes. Laws 1883. c. 114, § 4, requires notice of sale to be served on the owners and mortgagee of the premises. Notice was served on the defendants, who were the owners. They cannot complain that the mortgagee was not served. Judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 N.Y.S. 177, 24 N.Y. St. Rep. 111, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-stoddard-nycityct-1889.