Martin v. State

296 S.W.2d 546, 1956 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1965

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 160 Tex. Crim. 364 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 31, 1956·No. No. 28517·Published

Opinion

WOODLEY, Judge.

The conviction is for possession of marihuana, on a plea of guilty before the court; the punishment, three years.

No statement of facts is found in the record and no bills of exception.

In pronouncing sentence the trial cotirt failed to give application to the indeterminate sentence statute, art. 775, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.

The sentence is reformed so as to order appellant’s confinement in the penitentiary for not less than two years nor more than three years.

As reformed, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOODLEY, Judge.

The conviction is for possession of marihuana, on a plea of guilty before the court; the punishment, three years.

No statement of facts is found in the record and no bills of exception.

In pronouncing sentence the trial cotirt failed to give application to the indeterminate sentence statute, art. 775, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.

The sentence is reformed so as to order appellant’s confinement in the penitentiary for not less than two years nor more than three years.

As reformed, the judgment is affirmed.

Martin v. State, 296 S.W.2d 546, 1956 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1965 (Tex. 1956).

Pincite

296 S.W.2d 546 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.