Martin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Martin v. State

79 S.W.2d 871, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 705

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 122 Tex. Crim. 174 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 27, 1935·No. No. 17252·Published

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of robbery, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in' the state penitentiary for a term of nine years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No defect either in the indictment or in the procedure has been pointed out or has been perceived. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court.of Criminal Appeals, and approved by the court. ’

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of robbery, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in' the state penitentiary for a term of nine years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No defect either in the indictment or in the procedure has been pointed out or has been perceived. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court.of Criminal Appeals, and approved by the court. ’

Martin v. State, 79 S.W.2d 871, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 705 (Tex. 1935).

Pincite

79 S.W.2d 871 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.