Martin v. State
Opinions
The unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor is the offense; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.
Alvie Baker, the alleged purchaser, gave specific and direct testimony to the effect that he bought whiskey from the appellant. The transaction was denied by the appellant. The other testimony in the case was directed to the same issue.
No affirmative defense arises from the evidence. No complaint of the rulings of the trial court upon the admission or rejection of evidence is brought forward by bill of exceptions; nor was there any exception filed to the charge of the court.
The indictment is regular. The solution of the controverted issues by the jury is binding upon this court.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
270 S.W. 1117 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.