Martin v. State

235 S.W.3d 598, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1411, 2007 WL 2993769
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 365
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 16, 2007·No. ED 89123·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant Terrye Martin appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion for ineffective assistance of counsel without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the trial court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, a memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. State, 235 S.W.3d 598, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1411, 2007 WL 2993769 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

235 S.W.3d 598 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hazelbaker v. County of St. Charles
235 S.W.3d 598 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)