Martin v. State

756 S.W.2d 622, 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 1163, 1988 WL 84507
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 4094
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 16, 1988·No. No. 54621·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm the motion court’s order as movant has failed to show that the findings, conclusions and judgment were clearly erroneous. Rule 27.26(j). Because it would serve no precedential purpose, we affirm the order without written opinion under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. State, 756 S.W.2d 622, 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 1163, 1988 WL 84507 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988).

756 S.W.2d 622 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.