Martin v. State
This text of 266 S.E.2d 547 (Martin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant appeals his conviction for robbery by sudden snatching. Held:
The testimony of the sheriff was properly admitted, over the objection that it was hearsay, to explain the conduct of the officer in locating the alleged perpetrators of the offense. Watkins v. State, 231 Ga. 481 (202 SE2d 442) and cits.; Roberts v. State, 149 Ga. App. 667 (6) (255 SE2d 126); Cosby v. State, 151 Ga. App. 676 (2) (261 SE2d 424).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
266 S.E.2d 547, 153 Ga. App. 767, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 1970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-state-gactapp-1980.