Martin v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Martin v. State

118 S.E.2d 233, 103 Ga. App. 69, 1961 Ga. App. LEXIS 858

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 18, 1961·No. 38600·Published

Opinion

Carlisle, Judge.

The facts in this case, while involving a separate and distinct occurrence, are substantially and legally identical with the facts in Samuels v. State, ante, and the ruling and judgment in that case is controlling of the issues presented in this case. The evidence authorized the verdicts and judgments of guilty and the trial court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial on the general grounds.

Judgment affirmed.

Townsend, P. J., Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur. B. Clarence Mayfield, E. H. Gadsden, for plaintiffs in error. Eugene Cook, Attorney-General, G. Hughel Harrison, Assistant Attorney-General, Andrew J. Ryan, Solicitor-General, Sylvan A. Garfunkel, Assistant Solicitor-General, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carlisle, Judge.

The facts in this case, while involving a separate and distinct occurrence, are substantially and legally identical with the facts in Samuels v. State, ante, and the ruling and judgment in that case is controlling of the issues presented in this case. The evidence authorized the verdicts and judgments of guilty and the trial court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial on the general grounds.

Judgment affirmed.

Townsend, P. J., Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur. B. Clarence Mayfield, E. H. Gadsden, for plaintiffs in error. Eugene Cook, Attorney-General, G. Hughel Harrison, Assistant Attorney-General, Andrew J. Ryan, Solicitor-General, Sylvan A. Garfunkel, Assistant Solicitor-General, contra.

Martin v. State, 118 S.E.2d 233, 103 Ga. App. 69, 1961 Ga. App. LEXIS 858 (Ga. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

118 S.E.2d 233 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.