Martin v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Martin v. State

103 S.E. 194, 25 Ga. App. 304, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 756

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 11, 1920

Docket11331

StatusPublished

This text of 103 S.E. 194 (Martin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. State, 103 S.E. 194, 25 Ga. App. 304, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 756 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

Martin was convicted of the offense of larceny after trust. The sole question raised in the bill of exceptions is as to the proof of venue. The evidence amply authorized the jury to find that the defendant had the intent and did in Chatham county convert the property. The trial judge approved the verdict, and it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Walter C. Hartridge, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

Martin was convicted of the offense of larceny after trust. The sole question raised in the bill of exceptions is as to the proof of venue. The evidence amply authorized the jury to find that the defendant had the intent and did in Chatham county convert the property. The trial judge approved the verdict, and it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Walter C. Hartridge, solicitor-general, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 S.E. 194, 25 Ga. App. 304, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-state-gactapp-1920.