Martin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Martin v. State

185 So. 3d 621, 2016 WL 424607

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 3, 2016

DocketNo. 4D15-1625

StatusPublished

This text of 185 So. 3d 621 (Martin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. State, 185 So. 3d 621, 2016 WL 424607 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

[622]*622 ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant in part the appellant’s motion for rehearing, but only to clarify that the defendant’s appeal is from the denial of both his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion and his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion. We otherwise deny the appellant’s motion for rehearing in all other respects, and thereby maintain our affirmance of the defendant’s appeal on the merits. See Martinez v. State, 169 So.3d 170 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, C.J., MAY and GERBER, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI