Martin v. State
This text of 132 So. 113 (Martin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff in Error was convicted of murder in the second degree on an indictment charging murder *1599 in the first degree. He contends here. that the cause should be reversed because the evidence was insufficient, because of the refusal of requested charges, and because of the admission of certain evidence objected to by the defendant. We have examined the record and we do not think it supports any of these alleged errors. The evidence was ample to support the verdict and the charge given-by the trial court full and complete. The record was laden with immaterial, irrelevant, and useless drift.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
132 So. 113, 100 Fla. 1598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-state-fla-1931.