Martin v. State Farm Insurance
This text of 690 So. 2d 114 (Martin v. State Farm Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On March 13, 1996, this Court denied relator’s writ and we, in effect, agreed with the trial court that the Exception of Prescription was inappropriate. Thereafter, the relator applied for Supervisory and Remedial Writs to the Louisiana Supreme Court, which granted writs on May 17,1996 and remanded it to us “for full briefing, argument and opinion.”
Upon review, we find the trial court’s judgment dated February 3, 1996 to be contrary to law and, therefore, reverse the action of the trial court and do hereby grant the relator’s Exception of Prescription. See Payne v. Pedus Bldg. Serv., Inc., 95-877 (La.App. 5th Cir. 2/14/96), 671 So.2d 13.
WRIT OF REVIEW GRANTED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
690 So. 2d 114, 1997 WL 55662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-state-farm-insurance-lactapp-1997.