Martin v. State ex rel. Hall

Supreme Court of Kansas

Martin v. State ex rel. Hall

39 Kan. 576

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedJanuary 15, 1888

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 39 Kan. 576 (Martin v. State ex rel. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. State ex rel. Hall, 39 Kan. 576 (kan 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The county attorney of Stevens county had no right to institute this proceeding, in the name of the state, in the district court of Shawnee county, without the consent and against the objection of the attorney general. (Comp. Laws of 1885, ch. 25, art. 10, § 136; id., ch. 102, art. 7; Comm’rs of Leavenworth Co. v. Brewer, 9 Kas. 307.)

The order and judgment of the district court will be reversed, and the cause remanded, with direction to that court to vacate and set aside the injunction heretofore granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The county attorney of Stevens county had no right to institute this proceeding, in the name of the state, in the district court of Shawnee county, without the consent and against the objection of the attorney general. (Comp. Laws of 1885, ch. 25, art. 10, § 136; id., ch. 102, art. 7; Comm’rs of Leavenworth Co. v. Brewer, 9 Kas. 307.)

The order and judgment of the district court will be reversed, and the cause remanded, with direction to that court to vacate and set aside the injunction heretofore granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 Kan. 576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-state-ex-rel-hall-kan-1888.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack