Martin v. State
868 S.W.2d 466, 315 Ark. 493, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 211
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 316 Ark. 715 →
Opinion
Luther Martin, by his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk.
His attorney, Jim Pedigo, admits in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.
We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).
The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martin v. State, 868 S.W.2d 466, 315 Ark. 493, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 211 (Ark. 1994).
868 S.W.2d 466 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.