Martin v. State
180 So. 732, 28 Ala. App. 194, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 119
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 29 Ala. App. 395 →
Opinion
We have examined the record in this case as required by the statute. Code 1923, § 3258.
We find no error of a prejudicial nature in any of the rulings of the court. And, the record being free from error, the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martin v. State, 180 So. 732, 28 Ala. App. 194, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 119 (Ala. Ct. App. 1938).
180 So. 732 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.