Martin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Martin v. State

601 So. 2d 1107, 1992 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 11, 1992 WL 21023

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedJanuary 17, 1992

DocketCR 90-452

StatusPublished

This text of 601 So. 2d 1107 (Martin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. State, 601 So. 2d 1107, 1992 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 11, 1992 WL 21023 (Ala. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

ON RETURN TO REMAND

McMILLAN, Judge.

We remanded this case to the trial court with instructions to enter specific findings of fact as to each of the issues raised in the appellant’s petition. 587 So.2d 1289. The trial court has now filed its return, which shows the following:

“(1) The appellant’s guilty plea was voluntary and in accordance with his plea bargain arrangement with the State. “(2) The appellant’s arrest was lawful, no unlawful search or seizure was conducted, and no illegal statement or confession was obtained from the appellant. “(3) The appellant’s counsel was competent and duly investigated any potential defense.”

The findings of the trial court and the denial of the petition are supported by the record. The judgment of the trial court is due to be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

OPINION EXTENDED; AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI