Martin v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Martin v. State

361 So. 2d 1143, 1978 Ala. LEXIS 1948

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1977 Ala. LEXIS 2185 →

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided August 25, 1978·No. 77-705·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks to have this Court review by writ of certiorari a “No Opinion” affirmance of his conviction of the offense of first degree burglary. Petitioner does not invoke Rule 39(k), ARAP. Additionally, the “conflict” ground sought to be asserted does not cite any case alleged to be in conflict with the instant holding by the Court of Criminal Appeals, 361 So.2d 1142, nor does it specify wherein the alleged conflict exists. See Form 22, Appendix I, ARAP.

Thus, the petition for the writ is denied.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks to have this Court review by writ of certiorari a “No Opinion” affirmance of his conviction of the offense of first degree burglary. Petitioner does not invoke Rule 39(k), ARAP. Additionally, the “conflict” ground sought to be asserted does not cite any case alleged to be in conflict with the instant holding by the Court of Criminal Appeals, 361 So.2d 1142, nor does it specify wherein the alleged conflict exists. See Form 22, Appendix I, ARAP.

Thus, the petition for the writ is denied.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Martin v. State, 361 So. 2d 1143, 1978 Ala. LEXIS 1948 (Ala. 1978).

Pincite

361 So. 2d 1143 (Martin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.