Martin v. Stack
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7628
LARRY GENE MARTIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
AMY STACK,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (4:05-cv-02309-MBS)
Submitted: April 27, 2007 Decided: May 10, 2007
Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Gene Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin Albert Baroody, Samuel F. Arthur, III, AIKEN, BRIDGES, NUNN, ELLIOTT & TYLER, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Larry Gene Martin appeals the district court’s order
rejecting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting
summary judgment in favor of the Appellee in Martin’s action filed
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). Martin also appeals the
district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Martin v. Stack, No. 4:05-cv-02309-MBS (D.S.C. July 28,
2006; filed Sept. 11, 2006 & entered Sept. 12, 2006). We deny
Martin’s petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martin v. Stack (Martin v. Stack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.