Martin v. Stack

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 10, 2007·No. 06-7628·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7628

LARRY GENE MARTIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

AMY STACK,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (4:05-cv-02309-MBS)

Submitted: April 27, 2007 Decided: May 10, 2007

Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Gene Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin Albert Baroody, Samuel F. Arthur, III, AIKEN, BRIDGES, NUNN, ELLIOTT & TYLER, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Larry Gene Martin appeals the district court’s order

rejecting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting

summary judgment in favor of the Appellee in Martin’s action filed

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). Martin also appeals the

district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Martin v. Stack, No. 4:05-cv-02309-MBS (D.S.C. July 28,

2006; filed Sept. 11, 2006 & entered Sept. 12, 2006). We deny

Martin’s petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. Stack, (4th Cir. 2007).

Martin v. Stack (Martin v. Stack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related