Martin v. Splivalo
This text of 21 P. 547 (Martin v. Splivalo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a money judgment recovered by the respondent against the appellants. The record shows no errors. None of the pleadings or.proceedings in the court below, prior to the judgment, appear in the transcript, and the evidence is not brought up. In this condition of the record we must presume that the judgment appealed from was right. Judgment affirmed, with ten per cent damages.
We concur: Beatty, C. J.; Paterson, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 P. 547, 3 Cal. Unrep. 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-splivalo-cal-1889.