Martin v. Splivalo

California Supreme Court

Martin v. Splivalo

21 P. 547, 3 Cal. Unrep. 83

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. Splivalo. Read the opinion of the Court — 69 Cal. 611 →

California Supreme Court·Decided May 3, 1889·No. No. 11,938·Published

Opinion

WORKS, J.

This is an appeal from a money judgment recovered by the respondent against the appellants. The record shows no errors. None of the pleadings or.proceedings in the court below, prior to the judgment, appear in the transcript, and the evidence is not brought up. In this condition of the record we must presume that the judgment appealed from was right. Judgment affirmed, with ten per cent damages.

We concur: Beatty, C. J.; Paterson, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WORKS, J.

This is an appeal from a money judgment recovered by the respondent against the appellants. The record shows no errors. None of the pleadings or.proceedings in the court below, prior to the judgment, appear in the transcript, and the evidence is not brought up. In this condition of the record we must presume that the judgment appealed from was right. Judgment affirmed, with ten per cent damages.

We concur: Beatty, C. J.; Paterson, J.

Martin v. Splivalo, 21 P. 547, 3 Cal. Unrep. 83 (Cal. 1889).

Pincite

21 P. 547 (Martin v. Splivalo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.