Martin v. Southern Ry. Co.

1 F.R.D. 98, 1 Fed. R. Serv. 520, 1939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1648
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee
DecidedApril 4, 1939
DocketNos. 25-27
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 F.R.D. 98 (Martin v. Southern Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin v. Southern Ry. Co., 1 F.R.D. 98, 1 Fed. R. Serv. 520, 1939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1648 (E.D. Tenn. 1939).

Opinion

TAYLOR, District Judge.

It appearing that the defendant has incurred expense in the sum of $30 by way of deductions from its deposit for costs in three cases involving the same cause of action between the same parties heretofore voluntarily non suited by the plaintiffs, the motion of the defendant in each of the above styled cases to require the plaintiff to pay the costs of said former actions as a condition precedent to further prosecution of these suits is granted to the extent that plaintiffs be required to reimburse the defendant in the amount of $10 incurred by it in each of said non suited former actions, said reimbursement to occur within fifteen days of the filing of this memorandum. If said costs are not paid within said fifteen-day period, these cases will stand dismissed without further order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

World Athletic Sports Corp. v. Pahlavi
267 F. Supp. 160 (S.D. New York, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 F.R.D. 98, 1 Fed. R. Serv. 520, 1939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-southern-ry-co-tned-1939.