Martin v. Southern Railway Co.
181 S.E. 745, 208 N.C. 843, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 163
This text of 181 S.E. 745 (Martin v. Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Martin v. Southern Railway Co., 181 S.E. 745, 208 N.C. 843, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 163 (N.C. 1935).
Opinion
The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Justice Brogden not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed, as the disposition of this appeal, without becoming a precedent, in accordance with the practice of the Court. See Trust Co. v. Hood, 207 N. C., 862, 177 S. E., 16.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Burnette
87 S.E.2d 191 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)
Wells v. . Wells
21 S.E.2d 832 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)
Collins v. . Insurance Co.
197 S.E. 793 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)
Collins v. Security Mutual Life Insurance
213 N.C. 800 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
181 S.E. 745, 208 N.C. 843, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-southern-railway-co-nc-1935.