Martin v. Southern Railway Co.
181 S.E. 745, 208 N.C. 843, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 163
Opinion
The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Justice Brogden not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed, as the disposition of this appeal, without becoming a precedent, in accordance with the practice of the Court. See Trust Co. v. Hood, 207 N. C., 862, 177 S. E., 16.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martin v. Southern Railway Co., 181 S.E. 745, 208 N.C. 843, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 163 (N.C. 1935).
181 S.E. 745 (Martin v. Southern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Burnette
87 S.E.2d 191 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)
Wells v. . Wells
21 S.E.2d 832 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)
Collins v. . Insurance Co.
197 S.E. 793 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)
Collins v. Security Mutual Life Insurance
213 N.C. 800 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)