Martin v. Southern Railway Co.
66 S.E. 803, 7 Ga. App. 324, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 267
Opinion
A petition filed in a city court against a railroad company* alleging merely that “the train of the defendant company ran over and killed a shepherd dog of petitioner’s, of the value of $50,” was properly dismissed on demurrer. Even if the negligent killing of a dog' is actionable, it is necessary to allege the negligence, (Ga. R. Co. v. Williams, 3 (Ga. App. 272 (59 S. E. 846) ; Barden v. Ga. R. Co., 3 Ga. App-344 (59 S. E. 1122). Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martin v. Southern Railway Co., 66 S.E. 803, 7 Ga. App. 324, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 267 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).
66 S.E. 803 (Martin v. Southern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Baggett & Son v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
85 S.E. 928 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)