Martin v. Smiths Food & Drug Centers, Inc.
Opinion
Nevada Bar #001107 Nevada Bar #012988 3016 West Charleston Boulevard - #195 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 (702) 366-1125 FAX: (702) 366-1857 jbusby@cooperlevenson.com pkumar@cooperlevenson.com Attorneys for Defendant
QUINTNEY MARTIN, an individual, Case No. 2:22-cv-00833-APG-DJA
Plaintiff,
vs. STIPULATION AND ORDER TO SMITH’S FOOD & DRUG CENTERS, INC. EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO d/b/a SMITH’S FOOD AND DRUG, a foreign PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION TO corporation; DOES I through X; and ROE MAGISTRATE’S JUNE 20, 2024, ORDER ENTITIES I through X, (ECF No. 76) Defendants. (Second Request)
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff QUINTNEY MARTIN and Defendant SMITH’S FOOD & DRUG CENTERS, INC. by and through their respective counsel of records that the deadline for Defendant to file its Response to Plaintiff’s Objection to Magistrate’s June 20, 2024, Order and Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 76) be briefly extended by four (4) additional days until July 30, 2024. This stipulation is entered into and made pursuant to LR IA 6-1 and LR 7-1 as a result of conflicts in the schedule of defense counsel, among other issues, which make counsel unable to file their response on the current deadline of July 26, 2024. Good cause exists for the very brief additional continuance from the original deadline, July 17, 2024, due to both health and family related issues of the handling attorney. Furthermore, lead defense counsel is not presently located in the jurisdiction. / / / / / / This extension is sought in order to allow defense counsel sufficient time to properly address and brief all issues raised in ECF No. 76. As held in this Court, the practicalities of life, such as an attorney’s conflicting professional engagements or personal commitments, including but not limited to illnesses or deaths, often necessitate an enlargement of time to comply with a court deadline. Morales v. McDaniel, No. 3:17-cv-00197-MMD-CBC, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173103, at *4 (D. Nev. Oct. 3, 2019). The requesting party has acted diligently considering this request is timely and 7\| within the presently ordered deadline. /d. DATED this 26" day of July, 2024. TANNER LAW FIRM COOPER LEVENSON, P.A 1] /s/ Jeffrey C. Gunn /s/ Ty M. Maynarich (Nevada Bar No. 014584) DAVID A. TANNER, ESQ. JERRY S. BUSBY, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 08282 Nevada Bar No. 001107 JEFFREY C. GUNN, ESQ. POOJA KUMAR, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 015925 Nevada Bar No. 012988 7895 West Sunset Road — Suite 115 3016 West Charleston Boulevard - #195 Las Vegas, NV 89113 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 (702) 987-8888 (702) 366-1125 Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant QUINTNEY MARTIN SMITH’S FOOD & DRUG CENTERS, INC. IT IS SO ORDERED. Defendant’s response to ECF No. 76 is due by July 30, 2024. Z- ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATE: July 29, 2024
ty
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martin v. Smiths Food & Drug Centers, Inc. (Martin v. Smiths Food & Drug Centers, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.