Martin v. Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Martin v. Smith

57 Ind. 62

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1877·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Riddle, J.

On the 19th day of April, 1875, two years and a half ago, the appellants placed on file in this case, what they called a brief, in which they neither state nor [63]*63discuss a single point made in the record, since which time no brief has been filed on their behalt.

Nfe have often decided that such points as are not presented by the briefs will not he examined by this court, hut held as waived by the parties.

In accordance with this rule, the judgment is affirmed, at the costs of the appellants, with ten per cent, damages:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Riddle, J.

On the 19th day of April, 1875, two years and a half ago, the appellants placed on file in this case, what they called a brief, in which they neither state nor [63]*63discuss a single point made in the record, since which time no brief has been filed on their behalt.

Nfe have often decided that such points as are not presented by the briefs will not he examined by this court, hut held as waived by the parties.

In accordance with this rule, the judgment is affirmed, at the costs of the appellants, with ten per cent, damages:

Martin v. Smith, 57 Ind. 62 (Ind. 1877).

Pincite

57 Ind. 62 (Martin v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related