Martin v. Sheinberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Martin v. Sheinberg

42 A.D.2d 828, 346 N.Y.S.2d 791, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3882

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 6, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 42 A.D.2d 828 (Martin v. Sheinberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. Sheinberg, 42 A.D.2d 828, 346 N.Y.S.2d 791, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously modified in accordance with memorandum and as modified affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The fourth and fifth decretal paragraphs of the order should be stricken and there should be substituted therefor a paragraph requiring Stuart A. Sheinberg to continue to maintain policies on his life «existing at the time of the decree of divorce, to name David Sheinberg as [829]*829irrevocable beneficiary, and to furnish proof of such facts by means of a document from the life insurance company or companies issuing such policies. The record does not show any factual change in the father’s financial circumstances to warrant a reduction in the amount of insurance coverage ordered at the time of the decree on April 27, 1971. (Appeals from order of Erie Special Term in proceeding to modify divorce degree.) Present — Goldman, P. J., Del Vecchio, Moule, Cardamone and Simons, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously modified in accordance with memorandum and as modified affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The fourth and fifth decretal paragraphs of the order should be stricken and there should be substituted therefor a paragraph requiring Stuart A. Sheinberg to continue to maintain policies on his life «existing at the time of the decree of divorce, to name David Sheinberg as [829]*829irrevocable beneficiary, and to furnish proof of such facts by means of a document from the life insurance company or companies issuing such policies. The record does not show any factual change in the father’s financial circumstances to warrant a reduction in the amount of insurance coverage ordered at the time of the decree on April 27, 1971. (Appeals from order of Erie Special Term in proceeding to modify divorce degree.) Present — Goldman, P. J., Del Vecchio, Moule, Cardamone and Simons, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 A.D.2d 828, 346 N.Y.S.2d 791, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-sheinberg-nyappdiv-1973.