Martin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided July 7, 2026·No. 21-2220V·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 21-2220V

Filed: June 12, 2026

RONALD MARTIN, Special Master Horner

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for petitioner. Meghan Murphy, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On November 29, 2021, Ronald Martin (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that he suffered polymyalgia rheumatica (“PMR”) and a Table Injury of a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination he received on October 1, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) On September 26, 2022, petitioner filed an amended petition narrowing his claim to the alleged shoulder injury and specifying that he was pursuing that shoulder injury claim on a causation-in-fact basis or, alternatively, as a significant aggravation claim. (ECF No. 19.)

On December 5, 2025, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to compensation for a shoulder injury caused-in-fact by his flu vaccination. (ECF No. 43.) On June 11, 2026, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $105,604.53, including $105,000.00

1 Because this document contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be

made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the document will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755.

for pain and suffering and $604.53 for past unreimbursable expenses. (ECF No. 52.) In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. (Id.) Based on the record as a whole, I find that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award petitioner a lump sum payment of $105,604.53, representing $105,000.00 for pain and suffering and $604.53 for past unreimbursable expenses, to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Daniel T. Horner Daniel T. Horner Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice

renouncing the right to seek review.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

)

RONALD MARTIN, )

)

Petitioner, )

) No. 21-2220V

v. ) Special Master Horner ) ECF

SECRETARY OF HEALTH ) AND HUMAN SERVICES, )

)

Respondent. )

)

RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

On November 29, 2021, Ronald Martin (“petitioner”) filed a Petition (“Petition” or

“Pet.”) under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34,

as amended (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”). The Petition alleged that petitioner suffered polymyalgia

rheumatica (“PMR”) and a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”)

allegedly caused by an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on October 1, 2019. See Pet. at 1.

On September 26, 2022, petitioner filed an Amended Petition (“Am. Pet.”), alleging a “causation

in fact SIRVA” and, in the alternative, a claim of significant aggravation. See ECF No. 19.

On October 26, 2022, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) Report asserting that this case was

not appropriate for compensation. ECF No. 20. After the parties briefed entitlement, Special

Master Horner issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation on

December 5, 2025. ECF No. 43.

I. Items of Compensation

A. Pain and Suffering

Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $105,000.00 in pain and suffering.

See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.

B. Past Unreimbursable Expenses

Evidence supplied by petitioner documents that he incurred past unreimbursable expenses

related to his vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded past

unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $604.53. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(1)(B).

Petitioner agrees.

These amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.

II. Form of the Award

Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.

Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a

lump sum payment as described below and requests that Special Master Horner’s decision and

the Court’s judgment award the following 1: a lump sum payment of $105,604.53 to be paid

through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to

petitioner.

Respectfully submitted,

BRETT A. SHUMATE Assistant Attorney General

1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future, unreimbursed expenses, future lost earnings and future pain and suffering.

JONATHAN D. GUYNN Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division

HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division

VORIS E. JOHNSON, JR. Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division

/s/ Meghan R. Murphy MEGHAN R. MURPHY Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 616-4264 meghan.r.murphy@usdoj.gov

DATED: June 11, 2026

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on this 11th day of June, 2026, a true and correct copy of the foregoing

pleading was served via electronic mail to Richard Amada and Leah Durant at ramada@durantllc.com and ldurant@durantllc.com.

/s/ Meghan R. Murphy MEGHAN R. MURPHY

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2026).

Martin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Martin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a
§ 3501
44 U.S.C. § 3501