Martin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 19-50V UNPUBLISHED
SUSAN MARTIN, Chief Special Master Corcoran
Petitioner, Filed: September 21, 2020 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; HUMAN SERVICES, Table Injury; Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Respondent. Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)
Theodore J. Hong, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Seattle, WA, for petitioner.
James Vincent Lopez, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
On January 9, 2019, Susan Martin filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of a Prevnar 13 pneumococcal conjugate vaccine administered on April 3, 2017. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On September 10, 2020, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent concludes that “Petitioner suffered SIRVA as
1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). defined by the Vaccine Injury Table.” Id. at 5. Respondent further agrees that “Petitioner suffered the residual effects of her condition for more than six months.” Id.
In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Martin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.