Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Martin v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Martin v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

325 S.E.2d 925, 172 Ga. App. 756, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2653
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 170 Ga. App. 791 →
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 27, 1984·No. 68166·Published

Opinion

Deen, Presiding Judge.

The decision of the Court of Appeals in this case having been reversed by the Supreme Court, 253 Ga. 337 (320 SE2d 174) (1984), our decision in Martin v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 170 Ga. App. 791 (318 SE2d 144) (1984), is hereby vacated and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court.

Judgment reversed.

McMurray, C. J., and Sognier, J., concur. [757]*757Decided November 27, 1984. Henry C. Custer, for appellant. W. Earl McCall, Jesse W. Walters, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 325 S.E.2d 925, 172 Ga. App. 756, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2653 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984).

325 S.E.2d 925 (Martin v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
320 S.E.2d 174 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1984)
Martin v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
318 S.E.2d 144 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1984)